Beating the Street (Book): Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
=== Snippets and Highlights === | === Snippets and Highlights === | ||
* On the best time to buy stocks | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
This was the perfect scenario for the disciplined stockpicker to search his or her buy lists for likely prospects. The headlines were negative, the Dow Jones average had lost 600 points over the summer and the early fall, cabdrivers were recommending bonds, mutual-fund managers had 12 percent of their fund assets in cash, and at least five of my fellow panelists were predicting a severe recession. | This was the perfect scenario for the disciplined stockpicker to search his or her buy lists for likely prospects. The headlines were negative, the Dow Jones average had lost 600 points over the summer and the early fall, cabdrivers were recommending bonds, mutual-fund managers had 12 percent of their fund assets in cash, and at least five of my fellow panelists were predicting a severe recession. | ||
</blockquote> | </blockquote> | ||
On style-drift and why it is dangerous | * On his investment style | ||
<blockquote> | |||
The fact is that I never had an overall strategy. My stockpicking was entirely empirical, and I went sniffing from one case to another like a bloodhound that’s trained to follow a scent. I cared much more about the details of a particular story—for instance, why a company that owned TV stations was going to earn more money this year than last—than about whether my fund was underweighted or overweighted in broadcasting... | |||
What could happen is that I would meet with one broadcaster who would tell me that business was improving, and then he’d give me the name of his strongest competitor, and I’d check out the details, and often end up buying the second broadcaster’s stock. I followed scents in every direction, proving that a little knowledge about a lot of industries is not necessarily a dangerous thing. | |||
</blockquote> | |||
* On style-drift and why it is dangerous | |||
<blockquote> | <blockquote> | ||
In fact, when a value fund does better than its rivals in a lousy year for value funds, it’s not necessarily any cause for celebration. (This also applies to growth funds or any other kind of fund.) It may be that the manager has gotten disenchanted with value stocks and has invested some of the money in blue chips or utilities. He or she has gotten frustrated with the value style, especially when it hasn’t been working. The manager’s lack of discipline may produce good results in the short run, but the benefits may be fleeting. When value stocks come back, this manager won’t be fully invested in them, and his or her shareholders won’t be getting what they paid for. | In fact, when a value fund does better than its rivals in a lousy year for value funds, it’s not necessarily any cause for celebration. (This also applies to growth funds or any other kind of fund.) It may be that the manager has gotten disenchanted with value stocks and has invested some of the money in blue chips or utilities. He or she has gotten frustrated with the value style, especially when it hasn’t been working. The manager’s lack of discipline may produce good results in the short run, but the benefits may be fleeting. When value stocks come back, this manager won’t be fully invested in them, and his or her shareholders won’t be getting what they paid for. | ||
Revision as of 16:33, 16 September 2026
Snippets and Highlights
- On the best time to buy stocks
This was the perfect scenario for the disciplined stockpicker to search his or her buy lists for likely prospects. The headlines were negative, the Dow Jones average had lost 600 points over the summer and the early fall, cabdrivers were recommending bonds, mutual-fund managers had 12 percent of their fund assets in cash, and at least five of my fellow panelists were predicting a severe recession.
- On his investment style
The fact is that I never had an overall strategy. My stockpicking was entirely empirical, and I went sniffing from one case to another like a bloodhound that’s trained to follow a scent. I cared much more about the details of a particular story—for instance, why a company that owned TV stations was going to earn more money this year than last—than about whether my fund was underweighted or overweighted in broadcasting...
What could happen is that I would meet with one broadcaster who would tell me that business was improving, and then he’d give me the name of his strongest competitor, and I’d check out the details, and often end up buying the second broadcaster’s stock. I followed scents in every direction, proving that a little knowledge about a lot of industries is not necessarily a dangerous thing.
- On style-drift and why it is dangerous
In fact, when a value fund does better than its rivals in a lousy year for value funds, it’s not necessarily any cause for celebration. (This also applies to growth funds or any other kind of fund.) It may be that the manager has gotten disenchanted with value stocks and has invested some of the money in blue chips or utilities. He or she has gotten frustrated with the value style, especially when it hasn’t been working. The manager’s lack of discipline may produce good results in the short run, but the benefits may be fleeting. When value stocks come back, this manager won’t be fully invested in them, and his or her shareholders won’t be getting what they paid for.